Civil Liberties (AP)

self-incrimination

double-jeopardy

imminent domain

self-incrimination

double-jeopardy

imminent domain

does NOT allow people to break laws in the name of religion

is part of the First Amendment

none of the above

all of the above

says that a person can practice any religion they choose to

Writ of certiorari

Bill of attainder

Writ of habeas corpus

Ex post facto

defended a woman's right to have an abortion

used Griswold v. Connecticut as precedent

was decided using the implied constitutional right to privacy

all of the above

Does the average person in the community find the work distasteful?

Is the work offensive in a sexual manner?

Does the work have any literary, artistic, political, or scientific value?

Does the work contain falsified information?

Of course!

No, but I will by tomorrow!

Nope, and I'm not gonna try. Ignorance forever!

limits speech if it will bring about "substantive evils"

resulted from a court case involving the Espionage Act of 1917

both of the above

none of the above

Writ of certiorari

Bill of attainder

Writ of habeas corpus

Ex post facto

defines obscene speech ("obscenity" is not protected by the First Amendment)

is a four-pronged test

both of the above

none of the above

Writ of certiorari

Bill of attainder

Writ of habeas corpus

Ex post facto

just that the statement was false

that the statement was false, and that the publisher knew it was false (actual malice)

nothing

spoken defamation

written defamation

legal

Miranda Rights

Woman's right to choose to have an abortion

Griswold v. Connecticut

all of the above

Due Process Clause

Establishment Clause

Equal Protection Clause

All of the above are included in the 14th Amendment.

both of the above

says that the government cannot make an official national religion

is part of the First Amendment

none of the above

self-incrimination

double-jeopardy

imminent domain

First Amendment

Bill of Rights

14th Amendment

None of the above

True

False

says that no one shall be deprived of a court trial

says that no speech is excluded from First Amendment protection

says that evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in court

none of the above